Why is "Naomi Oreskes" trending?
Latest news, Wikipedia summary, and trend analysis.
Trend Analysis
- Ranking position: #
- Date: 2026-03-22 10:48:06
This topic has appeared in the trending rankings 1 time(s) in the past year. While it does not trend frequently, its appearance suggests a renewed or concentrated surge of public interest.
Based on Wikipedia pageviews and search interest, this topic gained significant attention on the selected date.
Trend Insight
This topic is not currently in the ranking.
Wikipedia Overview
Naomi Oreskes is an American historian of science. After 15 years as Professor of History and Science Studies at the University of California, San Diego., she became Professor of the History of Science and Affiliated Professor of Earth and Planetary Sciences at Harvard University in 2013, and in 2020 was also named the Henry Charles Lea Professor of the History of Science.
She has worked on studies of geophysics, environmental issues such as global warming, and the history of science. In 2010, Oreskes co-authored Merchants of Doubt, which identified significant parallels between the climate change debate and earlier public controversies, notably the tobacco industry's campaign to obscure the link between smoking and serious disease.
Related Topics
Trending Topic Today
Search Interest Perspective
-
Harvard Professor Naomi Oreskes Receives the 2025 Volvo Environment Prize - Volvo Group
-
‘Merchants of Doubt’ author, professor Naomi Oreskes wins top environmental prize - Harvard Gazette
-
Naomi Oreskes: "The role of the public university is to defend freedom" - Il Bo Live
-
2021 Distinguished Alumni Award Presented to Naomi Oreskes - Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability
-
Scientist, historian Naomi Oreskes speaks on ‘Why Disinformation Matters,’ Oct. 29 – Rhody Today - The University of Rhode Island
-
Naomi Oreskes, Harvard professor: ‘Science is vulnerable when it discovers things that threaten authority’ - EL PAÍS English
-
Naomi Oreskes: Feminist Science Is Better Science - Public Books
-
Naomi Oreskes: Should Scientists Serve as Sentinels? - American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
-
How to combat disinformation on climate science (Episode 18) - Peterson Institute for International Economics
-
Interview: Science historian Naomi Oreskes schools the Supreme Court on climate change - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
-
Opinion: The Impact of a Ghostwritten Paper on the Fate of Glyphosate - undark.org
-
Science historian Naomi Oreskes to talk about how free market ideology blocks climate action - Illinois News Bureau
-
Harvard Professor Naomi Oreskes lectures on the free market’s role in climate change - studlife.com
-
Why Do We Ignore the Dire Warnings of Scientists? An Interview with Naomi Oreskes - The Saturday Evening Post
-
Naomi Oreskes: ‘Discrediting science is a political strategy’ - The Guardian
-
Excerpt from Naomi Oreskes’ ‘The Big Myth’ - Harvard Gazette
-
Naomi Oreskes on Why Trust Science? - Princeton University Press
-
Why Trust in Science Is Critical: Five Questions for Naomi Oreskes - undark.org
-
In 'Why Trust Science?' Naomi Oreskes explains why the process of proof is worth trusting - Harvard Gazette
-
Naomi Oreskes on How to Write about Science - Harvard Magazine
-
Fifteen Questions: Naomi Oreskes on Climate Change Denial, Apolitical Scientists, and Her Favorite Rocks - The Harvard Crimson
-
Naomi Oreskes—Scientific Consensus, Climate Change, and the Merchants of Doubt - American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
-
IPCC, You’ve Made Your Point: Humans Are a Primary Cause of Climate Change - Scientific American
-
Eight Billion People in the World Is a Crisis, Not an Achievement - Scientific American
-
Naomi Oreskes on climate change: “We’ve blown it… but pessimism is not acceptable” - Mongabay
-
‘Market rules should benefit the majority of the citizenry’: historians Naomi Oreskes and Erik M Conway - The Guardian
-
High point for market fundamentalism? Would you guess Clinton? - Harvard Gazette
-
Harvard historian: strategy of climate science denial groups 'extremely successful' - The Guardian
-
Naomi Oreskes - Time Magazine
-
Environmental Protection Does Not Kill Jobs - Scientific American
-
Naomi Oreskes: Why Should We Believe In Science? - NPR
-
Harvard historian of science Naomi Oreskes takes on climate-change skeptics - Harvard Magazine
-
A Chronicler of Warnings Denied (Published 2014) - The New York Times
-
Why Scientists Got the Fast Pace of Arctic Warming Wrong - Scientific American
-
Did lawmakers know role of fossil fuels in climate change during Clean Air Act era? - Harvard Gazette
-
Why trust science? The answer is all around us. - New Hampshire Bulletin
-
Jeffrey Epstein’s Harvard Connections Show How Money Can Distort Research - Scientific American
-
From Saving the Earth to Ruling the World - Claremont Review of Books
-
Opinion | Exxon’s Climate Concealment (Published 2015) - The New York Times
-
The false promise of nuclear power in an age of climate change - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
-
Naomi Oreskes on the science of climate change and COVID-19 – and those who deny it - reporter.mcgill.ca
-
Why Trust Science? - with Naomi Oreskes - Royal Institution
-
The Humanist Interview with Naomi Oreskes - The Humanist
-
How free-market extremism became America’s default mode - Los Angeles Times
-
Book Review | ‘The Big Myth: How American Business Taught Us to Loathe Government and Love the Free Market’ by Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway - The Santa Barbara Independent
-
We Can't Solve Our Climate Problems without Removing Their Main Cause: Fossil-Fuel Emissions - Scientific American
-
Beware: transparency rule is a Trojan Horse - Nature
-
Climate Change Attribution: When Is It Appropriate to Accept New Methods? - Lloyd - 2018 - Earth's Future - AGU Publications
-
There is a new form of climate denialism to look out for – so don't celebrate yet | Naomi Oreskes - The Guardian
-
Merchant of Doubt, the most actual book today celebrates 15 years - Materia Rinnovabile | Renewable Matter
-
Naomi Oreskes: Why Should We Believe In Science? - Houston Public Media
-
Harvard climate historian talks activism under Trump, and the sexism of 'drill baby drill' - Haaretz
-
Public Campaign Against Exxon Has Roots in a 2012 Meeting (Published 2016) - The New York Times
-
Naomi Oreskes, a Lightning Rod in a Changing Climate (Published 2015) - The New York Times
-
Big university donors are distorting research agendas - Times Higher Education
-
Rebuilding Trust in Science: A Morton L. Mandel Conversation - American Academy of Arts and Sciences
-
Science vs. politics - Harvard Gazette
-
Our elected officials have known about climate change for decades - Yale Climate Connections
-
Merchants of Doubt by Naomi Oreskes and Erik M Conway | Book review - The Guardian
-
Fossil Fuel Deception - Living on Earth
-
Opinion | Climate Change Will Cost Us Even More Than We Think (Published 2019) - The New York Times
-
From denial to delay: How the oil industry refined its strategy on climate - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
-
Why trust science in a post-truth age? - National Center for Science Education
-
The real reason some scientists downplay the risks of climate change - The Guardian
-
The Big Myth: How American Business Taught Us to Loathe Government and Love the Free Market by Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway - California Review of Books
-
Why Should We Trust Science? - Science Friday
-
Naomi Oreskes asks "why trust science" in an age of denialism - newscientist.com
-
New Nuclear Power Plants Are Unlikely to Stop the Climate Crisis - Scientific American
-
Continental Rift - American Scientist
-
Contributor: Are we finally willing to limit the supply of fossil fuels? - Los Angeles Times
-
Why trust science? Naomi Oreskes wants you to believe in the value of scientific consensus - InForum
-
Science and the US Government - Living on Earth
-
How Naomi Oreskes Discovered the Roots of Climate Change Denial - capeandislands.org
-
Review | Big Business’s relentless push to equate the free market with freedom - The Washington Post
-
The climate crisis is a market failure, noted expert says - University of Colorado Boulder
-
Opinion | Playing Dumb on Climate Change (Published 2015) - The New York Times
-
‘Science on a Mission’ shows how military funding shaped oceanography - Science News
-
Interview with Naomi Oreskes - Times Higher Education
-
The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change - Science | AAAS
-
Scientists Get Things Wrong. But We Should Still Trust Science - Time Magazine
-
Q&A: ‘Merchants of Doubt’ Author on the Origins & Persistence of Climate Denialism - Inside Climate News
-
Opinion | The Myth That May Have Doomed the Titan (Published 2023) - The New York Times
-
Post World War II oceanography: how science and politics in the US became intertwined during the Cold War - Lampoon Magazine
-
SILA – The Competing Interests Shaping the Future of our Planet - American Academy of Arts and Sciences
-
Denialism and the 'Scientific Consensus': Naomi Oreskes' Attacks on Nuclear Energy and GMOs Expose Deep Divide Among Environmentalists - HuffPost
-
Scientists Failed to Use Common Sense Early in the Pandemic - Scientific American
-
Earth science: How plate tectonics clicked - Nature
-
Calling Our Times the ‘Anthropocene Epoch’ Matters Dearly to You - Scientific American
-
Heartland Replies to Naomi Oreskes - The Heartland Institute
-
Fossil fuel companies ‘poisoned the well’ of public debate with climate disinformation. Here’s how Australia can break free - The Conversation
-
Exxon Misled the Public on Climate Change, Study Says (Published 2017) - The New York Times
-
The False Promise of Carbon Capture as a Climate Solution - Scientific American
-
Safeguarding Sound Science: NCSE's new podcast - National Center for Science Education
-
How to Talk to Coronavirus Skeptics - The New Yorker
-
ExxonMobil misled the public about the climate crisis. Now they're trying to silence critics - The Guardian
-
The Public Wants Scientists to Be More Involved in Policy Debates - Scientific American
-
Op-Ed: Yes, ExxonMobil misled the public - Los Angeles Times
-
Is Nuclear Power the Answer to Climate Change? - Room for Debate - NYTimes.com - The New York Times
-
Opinion | What Exxon Mobil Didn’t Say About Climate Change (Published 2017) - The New York Times
-
Climate Denialism: A Brief History - Truthout
Why This Topic Is Trending
This topic has recently gained attention due to increased public interest. Search activity and Wikipedia pageviews suggest growing global engagement.
Search Interest & Related Topics
Search interest data over the past 12 months indicates that this topic periodically attracts global attention. Sudden spikes often correlate with major news events, public statements, or geopolitical developments.