GlobalHotword

Why is "American Society for Testing & Materials v. Public.Resource.Org" trending?

Latest news, Wikipedia summary, and trend analysis.

Trend Analysis

  • Ranking position: #
  • Date: 2026-04-12 06:50:48

This topic has appeared in the trending rankings 1 time(s) in the past year. While it does not trend frequently, its appearance suggests a renewed or concentrated surge of public interest.

Based on Wikipedia pageviews and search interest, this topic gained significant attention on the selected date.

Trend Insight

American_Society_for_Testing_&_Materials_v._Public.Resource.Org entered the ranking for the first time today at position #. This is its highest position ever recorded.

Trend History

This topic has appeared in the English Wikipedia rankings 1 time. It first appeared on 2026-04-12 and was most recently seen on 2026-04-12.

American Society for Testing & Materials v. Public.Resource.Org

Wikipedia Overview

American Society for Testing & Materials v. Public.Resource.Org is a United States court case concerning copyright of published building codes and fire codes and public access to the same. In 2013, Public.Resource.Org was sued by the ASTM, the National Fire Protection Association, and the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers for scanning and making available building codes and fire codes which these organizations consider their copyrighted property. The case was heard by the District Court for the District of Columbia with Judge Tanya S. Chutkan presiding. Chutkan ruled against Public.Resource.Org and ordered Malamud to delete all the standards from the Internet. Public.Resource.Org appealed the case to the D.C. Circuit. In 2018, the D.C. Circuit reversed and remanded the decision, holding that the fair use doctrines had been improperly applied. In March 2022 Chutkan issued an opinion that would allow Public.Resource.Org to reproduce 184 standards under fair use, partially reproduce 1 standard, and deny reproduction of 32 standards that were found to differ in substantive ways from those incorporated by law. The plaintiffs then appealed to the D.C. Circuit, which affirmed the trial court decision.

Read more on Wikipedia →

Related Topics

Search Interest Perspective

Why This Topic Is Trending

This topic has recently gained attention due to increased public interest. Search activity and Wikipedia pageviews suggest growing global engagement.


Search Interest & Related Topics

Search interest data over the past 12 months indicates that this topic periodically attracts global attention. Sudden spikes often correlate with major news events, public statements, or geopolitical developments.

Search Interest (Past 12 Months)

Related Topics

Related Search Queries